Cysylltu â ni

EU

Gêm ddwbl cwmnïau Ewropeaidd

RHANNU:

cyhoeddwyd

on

Last week, the European Union adopted the 14th package of sanctions, increasing pressure on Russia. The sanctions aim to limit Russia’s access to technology, finances, and resources, which should weaken its military potential and curb aggression towards Ukraine.

Er gwaethaf hyn, mae nifer o gwmnïau rhyngwladol mawr yn parhau i weithredu yn Rwsia, gan godi cwestiynau am safonau dwbl. Yn syth ar ôl dechrau ymosodedd Rwsiaidd, lansiodd Ysgol Economeg Kyiv y porth gadael-rwsia.org, sy'n cyhoeddi data ar gwmnïau sy'n parhau i weithio yn Rwsia, gan osgoi sefyllfa glir y gymuned fyd-eang. Yn ôl y KSE, ar hyn o bryd mae mwy na 2000 o fentrau o'r fath: mae'r rhestr yn cynnwys corfforaethau mawr fel Chery, Philip Morris, Auchan, Pepsi, Leroy Merlin, Nestle, a llawer o rai eraill. Ond dylid rhoi sylw arbennig i'r ffaith bod rhai cwmnïau yn parhau i weithredu'n gyfrinachol.

Yn eu plith mae'r cawr colur Swistir-Swedeg Oriflame, which, despite its public statements about ceasing activities in Russia, continues to receive significant profits from the Russian market. Previously, the issue of Oriflame’s double standards policy was raised by Italian MEP Anna Bonfrisco, who questioned not only the tools for investigating and curbing some of the cosmetics giant’s operations but also the prospects of freezing the company’s assets in the EU with the subsequent inclusion of its legal entities in future sanctions packages.

Delwedd ymgyrch

Roedd yr ymateb gan y Comisiwn Ewropeaidd, a gynrychiolwyd gan y Comisiynydd Sefydlogrwydd Ariannol, Gwasanaethau Ariannol, ac Undeb y Marchnadoedd Cyfalaf Mairead McGuinness, braidd yn ochelgar ac nid oedd yn cynnwys cynigion penodol ar gyfer datrys y sefyllfa – achosodd hyn siom ymhlith gweithredwyr a’r cyhoedd.

Delwedd ymgyrch

hysbyseb

Additionally, one of the sources of dissatisfaction is localized in Poland, where the company’s largest factory is located in the capital. At the end of May, Polish Sejm Deputy Lucjan Petrzyk addressed a question to the Minister of Trade and Industry regarding the suspension of the activities of Oriflame’s Russian legal entities. As of the end of June, there had been no response to the deputy’s inquiry. Earlier, journalists from agencja-informacyjna.com found that despite all the statements, Oriflame continues full-scale activities in Russia. The company’s products are sold through numerous channels, including Russian marketplaces and its own website, with the possibility of payment in rubles and delivery throughout the country. At the same time, alongside its activities in Russia, Oriflame supports Ukrainian soldiers.

Delwedd ymgyrch

The issue is also being raised in Ukraine, where Verkhovna Rada Deputy Serhiy Kuzminykh demanded that “Oriflame Holding AG” be included in the list of international war sponsors. Based on responses to parliamentary inquiries (a copy of the inquiry is available to the editorial office), the issue of preventing the company from operating on two fronts is already under the control of the SBU and the National Agency for the Prevention of Corruption, responsible for compiling the list of terrorism-sponsoring companies.

Although the efforts of Ukrainian authorities have yet to find proper resonance in Europe, it is worth noting the zeal with which Ukrainians defend their interests. Not long ago, the Ukrainian consulate in Switzerland, where Oriflame’s headquarters is located, sent an official inquiry to the company. But Oriflame’s response, as expected, was as abstract as possible, assuring that activities have been “reduced to almost a minimum.”

Delwedd ymgyrch

Oriflame and similar companies continue to profit from the war while hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians risk their lives defending their country. Russia’s military aggression has exposed a new dimension of moral responsibility to consumers and the world community – large international companies must take this into account even when it conflicts with their commercial interests. In the era of global awareness and instant information exchange, consumers demand transparency and sincerity, and any form of duplicity instantly becomes public knowledge.

Rhannwch yr erthygl hon:

Mae EU Reporter yn cyhoeddi erthyglau o amrywiaeth o ffynonellau allanol sy'n mynegi ystod eang o safbwyntiau. Nid yw'r safbwyntiau a gymerir yn yr erthyglau hyn o reidrwydd yn rhai o eiddo Gohebydd yr UE.

Poblogaidd